TESTIMONIALS

Posted by revolt | TESTIMONIALS | Thursday 30 December 2010 11:56 am

To The Homeowners Revolt.Com,

I don’t write testimonials very often, in fact almost never, but I had to share my thoughts and appreciation for the 90 day take back program, which you’ve designed to help us homeowners fight to save our homes. 

Without your company, I would have been left with no chance to fight my fraudulent foreclosure, as there is no way I could have afforded the $10K requested by the attorneys I spoke with.

I just completed the program, and although I was a bit skeptical at first, the more I researched, the more it made perfect sense to me. Your company provided me with all of the laws and legal authorities I needed in order to make an informed decision about the program. 

And I’m now happy to say that I was able to complete the program, and successfully take my property back free & clear. I followed the program step-by-step, and was able to reconvey the property title back into my name, and then put it in a trust to protect it further from the bank. Now the bank is calling me to see if there is something that can be worked out to resolve the matter. Before this, they wouldn’t give me the time of day.

So, I just want to thank you for all that you guys are doing for American homeowners, and for empowering me with the information and ammunition to help me fight back and save my home.  You guys are a God-Send. Thank you from the bottom of my heart.

Sincerely,

Phyllis C.

Los Angeles, Ca. – 2010

To The Homeowners Revolt.Com,

The bank had already started the foreclosure process, and I didn’t know what to do. I couldn’t afford an attorney, and they wouldn’t lift a finger to help me, or advise me.

I found your website, and read the information. It gave me hope, and provided me with direction so I could stand up for myself, and fight my foreclosure.

I completed the 90 day program, and revoked the trustee’s ability to foreclose on my property. I got the property back free & clear just as your program promised. It is amazing that this powerful, and empowering information is available, and the banks seem to be able to keep it out of the mainstream media. Thank you, thank you, thank you for what your company is doing to help homeowners.

 Sidney H.

Henderson, Nevada – 2010

To The Homeowners Revolt.Com,

I’ve searched the Internet for information that would help me fight my foreclosure, and no one else provided any options with the level of legal sophistication that your 90 day program provided.

I completed the program, and was able to take my property back free & clear. My friends didn’t believe it, but I am living proof that it works! Thank you guys for doing what you’re doing, and helping to literally save my life and home.

Curtis W.

Tampa, Florida – 2010

To The Homeowners Revolt.Com,

Just wanted to say a BIG thank you to the HR team for making this process possible and for helping the  home owner make a stand against the Pretender Lender.  This is an awesome tool, and you’ve been true to your word in helping me through it step by step.  I’ve completed the final phase of the process, and I feel empowered by it.  Thanks again! Keep up the good fight.

Pam L. – Naples, FL. – 4/2011

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

BANKS FOUND GUILTY OF FORECLOSURE FRAUD

Posted by revolt | BANKS FOUND GUILTY OF FORECLOSURE FRAUD | Wednesday 29 December 2010 8:57 am

BANKS FOUND GUILTY OF FORECLOSURE FRAUD

December 23, 2010

 

As A Result Of The Recent Investigation Launched By The Florida Attorney General’s Office, Bank Of America, GMAC Bank, JP Morgan Chase, and others, have All Been Found Guilty Of Foreclosure Fraud. 

Depositions By The Banks Employees Revealed That The Banks Have Been Forging, Falsifying, And Fabricating Documents In Order To Foreclose On Millions Of Homes Owned By Unsuspecting American Homeowners. 

Additionally, Wells Fargo Bank Has Admitted To 55,000 Counts Of Perjury In Submitting False Affidavits To The Courts In Its efforts to fraudulently Foreclose on homeowners.  

To add to this disgusting, and arrogant display of lawlessness by the banks, nothing has been done by The Justice Department, or any other Federal Officials in the way of civil or criminal charges against the banks, until now. 

Recently, The Arizona And Nevada Attorney Generals have filed a civil lawsuit against Bank Of America for fraud against homeowners seeking loan modification, and hopefully there will be more lawsuits on the way, as the Obama Administration has also launched a Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force to investigate and prosecute financial crimes in the lending and financial markets.

As bank fraud has already proved to be pervasive, lets hope that this task force has the political will and integrity to prosecute the banks, and the corrupt attorneys who represent them. 

These are essentially mortgages that the banks knew they did not own, but were willing to break the law in order to put homeowners out on the streets to satisfy their insatiable greed for even more money. 

In spite of clear and convincing documented evidence, in the forms of deposition testimony by bank employees, the banks have been carrying on as if nothing ever happened, and federal officials have seemingly given them the green light to continue to break the law with impunity. 

Until such time as The Department Of Justice, The SEC, And The Attorney Generals of each state decide to take action against these criminal banks, homeowners have no choice but to implement their own available legal strategies to fight to save their homes. 

Because most of these foreclosure cases involve the banks inability to produce the promissory note in order to prove they have any legal rights to foreclosure, homeowners have several legal strategies available to them, in order to stop the banks from fraudulently foreclosing on their homes. 

One of the more popular strategies employed of late is the “Produce The Note” Strategy. As a large percentage of mortgage loans were securitized, and sold to investors all over the world, it has been difficult, if not impossible for the banks to produce the required documents that would establish their right to foreclosure, as those documents have been lost in the Wall Street ether. This is why the banks have attempted to forge and falsify the documents, but have been recently caught, and found guilty of fraud. 

Secondly, the homeowner can also file a civil suit against the banks for fraud, and make them prove they are the rightful owner of the note who is authorized to foreclose on the homeowner’s property. 

Last, but definitely not least, is the latest, and possibly most powerful strategy available, which does not require a homeowner to go to court at all. It is strictly an administrative process pursuant to the Administrative Procedures Act Of 1946, by which the homeowner is legally able to reconvey the property title back into his/her name, thereby revoking any authority by the bank to foreclose on the property, and taking the property back free & clear usually within 90 days. 

This effectively puts the homeowner back in control, and forces the bank to deal with the homeowner, who now is negotiating from a position of strength, instead of begging the bank for help. The bank now has to go to the homeowner to resolve any title issues. 

Until such time as our Government Officials decide that they will uphold, and enforce the rule of law, and the U.S Constitution, and not allow themselves to be bought by the bank’s lobbyist, the American Homeowner must be willing to fight for their Constitutional Rights, and homes by any legal means necessary against the Federal Reserve, The Banks, and the wealthy Wall Street Barons, who created this mess with the full intention of fleecing the American Citizens from all of their remaining wealth in the form of equity in their homes.

 

By: Matt Brockman

The Homeowners Revolt.Com

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

VIDEO – THE 2ND REAL ESTATE COLLAPSE IS COMING

Posted by revolt | VIDEO - THE 2ND REAL ESTATE COLLAPSE IS COMING | Saturday 18 December 2010 5:45 pm

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

VIDEO – JUDICIAL CORRUPTION CONTINUES

Posted by revolt | VIDEO - JUDICIAL CORRUPTION CONTINUES | Saturday 18 December 2010 5:21 pm

Attorney Mathew Weidner’s view on the comimg real estate market.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

COURT FINDS JP MORGAN GUILTY OF FRAUD

Posted by revolt | COURT FINDS JP MORGAN GUILTY OF FRAUD | Saturday 18 December 2010 5:14 pm

JPMorgan Brings Foreclosure Case In Mortgage In Which It Was Just A Servicer, Court Finds Bank Committed Fraud

Submitted by Tyler Durden on 09/16/2010 16:37 –0500

An interesting development out of Jean Johnson, Circuit Judge in Duval Country, Florida, where in a case filed by JPMorgan/WaMu, as Plaintiff, and law firm of Shapiro and Fishman, attempted to evict defendants Hank and Marilyn Pocopanni.

As basis for the legal case, WaMu had submitted an assignment of mortgage, which however the court just found never actually belonged to WaMu, and instead was carried on the books of Fannie Mae.

Once this was uncovered is where this case gets really interesting: In point 5 of the filing we read that the “plaintiff predecessor counsel made “clerical errors” when it represented to the Court that the plaintiff was the owner and holder of the note and mortgage rather than the servicer for the owner.” 

Which means that only Fannie had the right to foreclose upon the Pocopannis, yet JPM, as servicer, decided to take that liberty itself. And here the Judge got really angry: “The court finds WAMU, with the assistance of its previous counsel, Shapiro and Fishman, submitted the assignment when [they] knew that only Fannie Mae was entitled to foreclose on the Mortgage, and that WAMU never owned or held the note and Mortgage.”

And, oops, “the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence that WAMU, Chase and Shapiro & Fishman committed fraud on this Court” and that these “acts committed by WAMU, Chase and Shapiro amount to a “knowing deception intended to prevent the defendants from discovery essential to defending the claim” and are therefore fraud.

While the Judge in this case did not also find declaratory damages against the plaintiff, and while the case of the defendants is unclear (we would expect Fannie to file a foreclosure act on its own soon enough), the question of just how pervasive this form of “fraud” in the judicial system is certainly relevant.

if JPM takes the liberty of foreclosing on mortgages as merely servicer, when it has no legal ground for such an action, who knows how many such cases the legal system is currently clogged up with. The implications for the REO and foreclosures track for banks could be dire as a result of this ruling, as this could severely impact the ongoing attempt by banks to hide as much excess inventory in their books in the quietest way possible.

Our advice to any party caught in a foreclosure process is to immediately go to www.fnma.com and use the Lookup Tool to see if Fannie is still mortgage owner of record, if a foreclosure suit has been brought up by a plaintiff other than the GSE.

We are confident quite a few other such cases will promptly appear.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

JUDGE REAMS CITI BANK FORECLOSURE ATTORNEY

Posted by revolt | JUDGE REAMS CITI BANK FORECLOSURE ATTORNEY | Saturday 18 December 2010 4:53 pm

Judge reams Citi housing lawyer

By JOSH KOSMAN
Last Updated: 8:56 AM, December 17, 2010
Posted: 11:46 PM, December 16, 2010

Lawyers handling foreclosures in New York will think twice about showing up in court without the proper paperwork after a Brooklyn judge ripped into lender Citigroup and its unprepared lawyer.

On Monday, Brooklyn Supreme Court Judge Arthur Schack mocked the bank and its lawyer for failing to ensure the accuracy of papers filed in a foreclosure case.

“The court does not work for Citi and cannot wait for Citi, a multi-billion-dollar financial behemoth to get its act together,” Schack said, in throwing out the case.
The decision follows a new rule implemented by the chief judge of New York’s courts requiring every lawyer handling a foreclosure to sign a form verifying that all paperwork in the case is correct.

Since the rule was enacted in October, lenders have largely stopped pursuing the 80,000 foreclosure cases pending in the state.

In February 2009, Citi started proceedings against Angela Nunez, who owns property in the Cypress Hills section of Brooklyn. Bayside lawyer Vincent Surico, who represented Citi, said on Oct. 25 that he would file a written affirmation guaranteeing the paperwork.

But this week Surico said he could not sign because before Nov. 8 Citi did not have the “procedures to comply” with the order. Schack said if Citi moved to reinstate the foreclosure, a lawyer would need to sign the affirmation. Surico and Citi declined to comment.

Anne Copps, chairman of the Real Property Law Section of the New York Bar, said she believes this is the first New York case of its kind. “This will certainly encourage lawyers not to move to foreclosure without affirmations,” she said. “It will take some time for lenders to review their files and pull together their affidavits so attorneys can do affirmations.”

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
These microbes compete for nutrients from the food you eat get levothyroxine online no prescription the drugs are used to kill bacteria. certainly, many people have benefited from using them buy antibiotics without prescriptions this chapter addresses the possibility that antibiotics may help fungi to proliferate within the human body can i buy amoxicillin over the counter as an adult human, you have three to four pounds of beneficial bacteria and yeast living within your intestines ordering bactrim online yeasts are opportunistic organisms. this means that, as the intestinal bacteria die, yeasts thrive, especially when their dietary needs are met where can i buy propecia this results in a syndrome called leaky gut. yeasts are not the only possible cause of this syndrome lynoral buy this practice not only possibly contributes to antibiotic resistance in humans tetracycline to buy as an adult human, you have three to four pounds of beneficial bacteria and yeast living within your intestines order cipro online i don,t know if larger doses are in fact administered to people buy online levothroid simply put, antibiotics are poisons that are used to kill. only licensed physicians can prescribe them clavulanate purchase i,ll assume that the same toxicity scale remains in place today purchasing bupropion online some scientists have linked non-steroidal, anti-inflammatory drugs (nsaids) such as naproxen and ibuprofen to the problem aciphex to buy online yeasts grow unchecked into large colonies and take over, in a condition called dysbiosis where to buy pharmacy when you do so, you upset the delicate balance of your intestinal terrain erythromycin buy i,ll assume that the same toxicity scale remains in place today purchase acillin however, if bacteria were the only organisms that antibiotics killed, much of this book would be unnecessary antibiotics without prescriptions buy yeasts grow unchecked into large colonies and take over, in a condition called dysbiosis